I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍nstructions Area of Specialization Case Study Conduct an an

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍nstructions Area of Specialization Case Study Conduct an analysis of one of the below listed case studies that corresponds with the chapter to your selected area of specialization. Submit the analysis to the Module 7 Written Exercise Assignment folder. Follow the Case Study Format that was prov‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ided to you. Chapter 12, the Hope Correctional Facility case Follow the four-step Case Study Format and submit your analysis of one case study: 1. Give a report of the FACTS 2. Identify the Key Issue 3. Contributory factors & Root causes 4. Lessons learned and recommendations‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

Assignment: Disciplining Employees Who Violate Discrimination Laws As the HR Dir

Assignment: Disciplining Employees Who Violate Discrimination Laws
As the HR Director, you recently learned of Ms. Ramirez’s behaviors and will write a 2 page memo to the CEO that will recommend either terminating or disciplining Rachella Ramirez, the Marketing VP, in this week’s Discussion.
To complete this Assignment, your memo should include the following:
An introduction which briefly explains the situation and addresses the difference(s) between potential disparate impact and disparate treatment.
A review of the laws involved in the situation, i.e., age discrimination laws relevant to termination in the workplace and how they were violated by Rachella’s behaviors.
A recommendation of whether Rachella should be terminated or disciplined, and why.
A draft of the written memo you would recommend be given to Rachella to support your decision to either discipline or terminate her.
ALERT: Revise/edit your memo based on Instructor feedback. You will use your revision of this document in Week 6 Discussion.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.

Short essay A list of current topics in occupational health and safety is provid

Short essay
A list of current topics in occupational health and safety is provided below. Students are asked to choose a topic from the list that interests them and write a maximum a2000 word essay on the subject. The essay should clarify the following:
Why is the topic important or of interest?
What are the latest research and/or legislations suggesting in relevance to the topic?.
What are the future challenges on the topic that HR professionals/researchers/legislators should address?
While the essay should be based on solid research, referenced in APA style format, students are encouraged to have a critical lens and add their own unique perspectives based on their research.
Use double spaced font size 12 Times New Roman for your submission file.
List of topics:
Non-standard working hours and OHS
Employer’s liabilities for home-based employees
Job security and OHS in the next decades
Internet harassment (cyberbullying) and OHS
#metoo & OHS
OHS for contingent workers in the gig economy
Mental Health and OHS
OHS and home care workers
Smartphone stress and OHS
Climate crisis and OHS
Globalization and OHS
Legalization of recreational cannabis and OHS
OHS and leadership from the top
Data analytics and OHS
Is there an OHS issue about which you are passionate to write an essay, but it is not included on this list? Please write an email to me and let’s discuss.
Essays are graded based on the following criteria.
A= far exceeds standard B= exceeds standard C= Meets standard D= below standard
Argument (intro/conclusion): To what extent is the essay clearly stating an original and interesting argument at the beginning and reaching a logical conclusion based on the analysis in the end? (30%)
Analysis (body of the essay): To what extent are the arguments presented in the essay supported by a thoughtful synthesis of peer-reviewed papers and other reliable sources? (30%)
Organization: To what extent does the essay show attention to logic and reasoning of points to guide the reader to the conclusion. (30%)
Grammar and mechanics: To what extent is the essay free of distracting and serious grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors? Are all the sources correctly cited according to the requirements of the recommended referencing style? (10%)

Step 1: Review the following scenario. Review the hypothetical case of Speeker v

Step 1: Review the following scenario.
Review the hypothetical case of Speeker v. South Bay County School District found below:
Susie Speeker attended an event-sponsored health fair.
Susie’s trail, Oliver Wendell Holmes soaring rail, had a booth at the fair.
One of the topics she chose was the harmful effects of drugs use.
Susie attended the fair with her mother, father, and brother. Susie’s mother is a cancer survivor.
The Speeker family believes that hemp should be legalized for compassionate use. Susie held a sign at the fair that give support to Be compassionate, legalize ganja for medical purposes.
Susie was photographed carrying the sign. The picture of Susie, with the sign, was published in the school paper. She was banned from school for ten days. Issue Did the school district have the right to suspend Susie for her act? Presume the school district was not justified in so doing; Does Susie have a cause of action based on 42 U.S.C. 1983? Discussion 42 U.S.C. 1983 and any relief available to those whose constitutional rights have been violating by anyone acting with State authority. Susie and her parents appealed the decision of the South Bay County School District which upheld the suspension. Does Tinker v. Des Moines set precedent for this matter. In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Court held that students have a right to display armbands at school. Let’s assume that you’ve already done one legal research project about this matter. You’ve already determined that the school district was not justified in suspending Susie.
Now you have a new project:
Based on the statutory language of 42 USC sec. 1983 and the facts of the case determine whether Susie has a claim under 42 USC sec. 1983.
STAY ON TARGET: Do NOT look at case law or write a lot about facts that do not exist. Answer the question at hand.
Please do this in complete sentences and in paragraph form.
In answering the question at hand:
1. Write the appropriate parts of the statute in your own words. Then write how the relevant facts match up with the appropriate sections of the statute.
2. Think about which way you’d write the Statement of Facts for this problem if you had to write a Memorandum of Law. Write which method you would choose for this problem and why.
3. Remember — this is only a discussion post. Write a couple of paragraphs that simply answer the question.
Step 2: Identify the steps and complete sentences and paragraph form needed to create your Statement of Facts.

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍hat exactly is amateurism and what problems does it create

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍hat exactly is amateurism and what problems does it create legally? Historically, where did the concept come from and has its definition evolved effectively to keep pace with the evolution of the sports industry? University of Denver v. Nemeth, 257 P.2d 423 (1953) Banks v. NCAA, 977 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.) Bloom v. NCAA, 93 P.3d 621 (Colo. App. 2004) 1. Issue/Controversy – Provide background into the conditions and circumstances that contribute to the legal “controversy” that exists in Amateurism. Why do we have a problem? What is the issue that is presented? What problem are we trying to solve? 2. Statements of Law – What is the actual law regulating or covering Amateurism? What body of law applies? Is it state or federal legal question or does some other body of law/regulation apply (e.g., CBA, NCAA bylaws, other)? 3. Analysis – Here i‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s where you want to relate your facts to the legal issue of Amateurism. How do the facts and circumstance surrounding the issue contribute to the controversy? Do the facts address the legal elements of the law? Has there been lawsuits or cases on the same issue? How did other courts decide the matter? What are the counterarguments on the topic (., what does the other side have to say on the matter?) Who are the chief proponents or detractors in the controversy? 4. Conclusion – Based on the analysis of the issue, law, facts, and legal history, what conclusion do you want to leave the reader with? Do you agree with the way the cases in this area have been decided? Is the law “correct” in its application? What can we expect in the future? Other- use sections, headers, sub-headers, etc. These help you to organize your thoughts and present them ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍more effectively.

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍hat exactly is amateurism and what problems does it create

W‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍hat exactly is amateurism and what problems does it create legally? Historically, where did the concept come from and has its definition evolved effectively to keep pace with the evolution of the sports industry? University of Denver v. Nemeth, 257 P.2d 423 (1953) Banks v. NCAA, 977 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.) Bloom v. NCAA, 93 P.3d 621 (Colo. App. 2004) 1. Issue/Controversy – Provide background into the conditions and circumstances that contribute to the legal “controversy” that exists in Amateurism. Why do we have a problem? What is the issue that is presented? What problem are we trying to solve? 2. Statements of Law – What is the actual law regulating or covering Amateurism? What body of law applies? Is it state or federal legal question or does some other body of law/regulation apply (e.g., CBA, NCAA bylaws, other)? 3. Analysis – Here i‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s where you want to relate your facts to the legal issue of Amateurism. How do the facts and circumstance surrounding the issue contribute to the controversy? Do the facts address the legal elements of the law? Has there been lawsuits or cases on the same issue? How did other courts decide the matter? What are the counterarguments on the topic (., what does the other side have to say on the matter?) Who are the chief proponents or detractors in the controversy? 4. Conclusion – Based on the analysis of the issue, law, facts, and legal history, what conclusion do you want to leave the reader with? Do you agree with the way the cases in this area have been decided? Is the law “correct” in its application? What can we expect in the future? Other- use sections, headers, sub-headers, etc. These help you to organize your thoughts and present them ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍more effectively.

Assignment: Disciplining Employees Who Violate Discrimination Laws As the HR Dir

Assignment: Disciplining Employees Who Violate Discrimination Laws
As the HR Director, you recently learned of Ms. Ramirez’s behaviors and will write a 2 page memo to the CEO that will recommend either terminating or disciplining Rachella Ramirez, the Marketing VP, in this week’s Discussion.
To complete this Assignment, your memo should include the following:
An introduction which briefly explains the situation and addresses the difference(s) between potential disparate impact and disparate treatment.
A review of the laws involved in the situation, i.e., age discrimination laws relevant to termination in the workplace and how they were violated by Rachella’s behaviors.
A recommendation of whether Rachella should be terminated or disciplined, and why.
A draft of the written memo you would recommend be given to Rachella to support your decision to either discipline or terminate her.
ALERT: Revise/edit your memo based on Instructor feedback. You will use your revision of this document in Week 6 Discussion.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍nstructions The United States judicial systems are based on

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍nstructions The United States judicial systems are based on the Constitution of the United States guaranteeing due process of the law. All court officers, prosecutors, defense attorneys, public defenders, and judges are bound to an oath of office and the code of ethics to obey to the law. Everybody is equal in front of the law. Is this statement still valid? Create a critical analysis based on the following statements: The prosecutor evaluates the evidence and facts of a case and decides to prosecute or to nolle prosequi the criminal cases. Explain how the “the desire to win” can lead a prosecutor to pursue a case that should be dropped? Provide an example to strengthen your argument. Most minority offenders are indigent and can’t afford a private defense attorney. Therefore, the court will assign a public defender to represent the defendant. The public defender maintains a heavy workload with minimum budgets. Does‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ the public defender behave ethically when he or she is pushing plea bargains in most cases or is plea bargaining a violation of a defendant’s rights to due process? In the prisons and jails, minorities represent most of the population. Determine if sentencing decisions discriminate against certain groups. Determine if more whites are sentenced to probation versus minorities, even when they commit the same crime. Support your answer with statistical information. Indicate if those sentences are unethical, and then determine what can be done to minimize discrimination. Most of the sentences are retributive, resulting in incarceration. Consider the three ethical frameworks for punishment: 1) utilitarianism, 2) deontology, and 3) peacemaking. Which framework should serve as the ethical framework for punishment today? Support your decision with an example. Length: 6-8 pages References: Include a minimum of five scholarly r‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍esources.

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ubject: homeland Security response to critical incident. Th

S‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ubject: homeland Security response to critical incident. This paper must be at least five pages of narrative and include an introduction and conclusion. The requirement is to explain the warning process in critical inc‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍idents and describe issues that may detract from or nullify warning. Use the course materials and your own research. Also, be sure to include a title page and reference/citation page. They are not part of the page count‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

Write a short review essay on one of the following assigned readings ( supplemen

Write a short review essay on one of the following assigned readings (
supplementary reading
pdfs for classes 3 and 4 in
Brightspace):
William Twining, “The Great Juristic Bazaar”
or
John Borrows, Wampum at
Niagara: The Royal Proclamation, Canadian Legal
History, and Self Government”
Review Essay Requirements:
The essay is worth 30% of your final grade, will be marked out of 30, and is due
by 4:00 pm on Monday
October 18. The essay should be 1,000

1,200 words (three to four pages, double spaced, regular font and margins).
Please indicate your name and student number, your TA’s name, the name of your sected author and date on the front of your essay.
The essay submission l
This essay is a review of your selected reading and should focus on it, but you may also refer to the relevant parts of chapters 1 and 2 of the Looking at Law
course textbook and my lectures. Other outside
readings are not required. Your review should include the following elements which will be graded in the completed marking rubric returned to you on Brightspace once your TA has completed assessments and I have reviewed marking of all the essays:
Description
: Briefly describe the topic examined and situate it in scholarly debates about the law. Author’s Theme
: What is the author’s main point or central argument?
Author’s Analysis: How does the author support his main point or argument by way of evidence,examples or illustrations, criticism of other per
spectives or previous scholarship?
Your Assessment : Are you convinced by the author or not? Why?