P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease add a couple of additional references I need to expan

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease add a couple of additional references I need to expand the cultural assessment paper written to include all of the items in the rubric‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ that is included and PowerPoint slides and a one-page abstract for the other students to read. If more slides are needed, please let me kno‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍w

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍reparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when comple

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍reparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Write a brief 1-2 paragraph weekly reflection addressing the questions posed in the Reflect section of each weekly module. Edit your Reflection to include each weekly reflection. Include the following sections in your Reflection. Week 1 Reflect upon your Week 1 learning journey and consider the following in one paragraph. Discuss ethical principles you are applying to your DNP project. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. Week 2 Reflect upon your Week 2 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss how the literature search informed your choice of an evidence-based intervention. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. Week 3 Reflect upon your Week 1 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss why the intervention you chose will work best at your site. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. (The intervention is to implement the ADA Gui‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍deline 5 to improve blood glucose levels and decrease weight in patients suffering. Week 4 Reflect upon your Week 4 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss your strategies to engage the stakeholders at your project site. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. Week 5 Reflect upon your Week 5 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss how you will incorporate IT into your project. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. Week 6 Reflect upon your Week 6 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss your leadership skills and which skills you need to obtain to become a more effective leader. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. Week 7 Reflect upon your Week 7 learning journey in NR705 and consider the following in one or two paragraphs. Discuss one DNP Essential and how you are applying this to your project implementation. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

p‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease follow attached word doc for instructions. I will nee

p‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease follow attached word doc for instructions. I will need 2 uploads, the infographic, and the scree‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍n shot from Canva.com showing the infographic. Much appreciated. reach out to me for further question‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ssignment: Assessing and Treating Patients With Psychosis a

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ssignment: Assessing and Treating Patients With Psychosis and Schizophrenia Psychosis and schizophrenia greatly impact the brain’s normal processes, which interfere with the ability to think clearly. When symptoms of these disorders are uncontrolled, patients may struggle to function in daily life. However, patients often thrive when properly diagnosed and treated under the close supervision of a psychiatric mental health practitioner. For this Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with psychosis and schizophrenia. To prepare for this Assignment: Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week. Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients with schizophrenia-related psychoses. ******The Assignment: 5-6 pages Examine Case Study: Pakistani Woman With Delusional Thought Processes. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. BELOW IS THE LINK FOR THE CASE STUDY At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature. *******Introduction to the case (1 page) -Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. ******Decision #1 (1 page) 1)Which decision did you select? 2)Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. 3)Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. 4)What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). 5)Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. ****Decision #2 (1 page) 1)Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. 2)Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. 3)What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). 4)Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. *****Decision #3 (1 page) 1)Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, inclu‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ding the primary literature. 2)Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. 3)What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature). 4)Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples. *****Conclusion (1 page) Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature. *****Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of six academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature. Reminder : The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Learning Resources FOR NURS 6630 Psychopharmalogical Approaches to Treat Psychopathology Required Readings (click to expand/reduce) MAY BE HELPFUL Freudenreich, O., Goff, D. C., & Henderson, D. C. (2016). Antipsychotic drugs. In T. A. Stern, M. Favo, T. E. Wilens, & J. F. Rosenbaum. (Eds.), Massachusetts General Hospital psychopharmacology and neurotherapeutics (pp. 72–85). Elsevier. American Psychiatric Association. (2019). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Clozapine REMS. (2015). Clozapine REMS: The single shared system for clozapine. Funk, M. C., Beach, S. R., Bostwick, J. R., Celano, C. M., Hasnain, M., Pandurangi, A., Khandai, A., Taylor, A., Levenson, J. L., Riba, M., & Kovacs, R. J. (2018). Resource document on QTc prolongation and psychotropic medications. American Psychiatric Association. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13(2), 261–276. Levenson, J. C., Kay, D. B., & Buysse, D. J. (2015). The pathophysiology of insomnia. Chest, 147(4), 1179–1192. McClellan, J. & Stock. S. (2013). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(9), 976–990. Naber, D., & Lambert, M. (2009). The CATIE and CUtLASS studies in schizophrenia: Results and implications for clinicians. CNS Drugs, 23(8), 649–659. Medication Resources (click to expand/reduce) . Food & Drug Administration. (.). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs.

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍rguementative analysis topic: Veatch argues vigorously agai

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍rguementative analysis topic: Veatch argues vigorously against the traditional idea that the physician knows best. Are there additional reasons beyond what he provides for the correctness of his view? If so, how might his critics respond? Alternatively, what different lines of reasoning are there for thinking Veatch is wrong besides the approach offered by Groll? Argument Analyses are formal essays, and should be formally written and carefully edited prior to submission in the Dropbox. They should exhibit appropriate essay writing techniques (e.g., essay motivation, an early and clear thesis, section and topic sentences, paragraph organization), academic formatting and adherence to grammatical guidelines. This essay should achieve 1,200 – 1,500 words of analysis (exclusive of headings, source citations, and concluding remarks). Detailed guidelines, ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍including a rubric, for this assignment will be made available in the course. An acceptable argument analysis must clearly address a specific philosophical question and provide a well-reasoned answer. The formulation of the question and the answer must employ appropriate ethical concepts, principles, and styles of reasoning addressed in the course. Argument Analyses, like the other assignments, should avoid quotation wherever possible. However, when quotations or close paraphrasing are necessary for clarity or to explicate a problem in these essays, a more formal citation is called for. Whether referring to assigned materials or outside research, use the Chicago style footnote method to insert necessary citations at the bottom of the page where the reference appears. (Resources for preparing these citations and page formats will be included in the course.‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍)

B‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ased your reading of the attached article “A randomized, bl

B‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ased your reading of the attached article “A randomized, blinded trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk for ischemic events” : Submit a three page paper (excluding title page and reference page) discussing potential confounders and how they were controlled for in the design and analysis phase. Use your readings to provide support and rationales for your responses. Include a brief introductory paragraph regar‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ding the purpose and aims of the study. Organize the remaining paper using the following level 1 headings Potential Confounders (What were they?) Controls for Confounding the Design Stage ( Was this done? if so why and justify the approach used), Controls for Confounding in the Analysis Stage (Was this done? If so why and Include statistical approach used and overall outcome of the study) Conclusion At least two reference‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s

N‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍UR/PNR 172 Health Disparities Writing Assignment When ad

N‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍UR/PNR 172 Health Disparities Writing Assignment When addressing the Health Disparities assignment, please focus and answer the following: 1. Define and explain the concept of health disparity 2. Discuss why health and health disparity matter to a nurse. (generalized or specific to your topic). 3. Clearly describe the health disparity chosen and discuss how health care and personal health interrelate with your chosen health disparity issue as well as the specific factors (determinants) contribute to the health disparity c‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍hosen. (Support the disparity with at least one peer reviewed cited source.) 4. Identify groups that are most affected by the health disparity you chose and state how you arrived at this conclusion. 5. Evaluate how health disparities impact people in the local community. 6. Identify at least 3 key initiatives to address your chosen health disparity topic. 7. Identify current challenges to addressing your chosen health disparity. 8. Create a reflection that includes what was learned and how it will affect your nursing practi‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ce.

D‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍escribe the steps of the evidence-based research process an

D‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍escribe the steps of the evidence-based research process and the importance of using them. In the initial stages of an EBP project, where do nurses in your specialty go to locate sources of infor‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍mation that help them to determine whether or not a practice problem is appropriate for an evidence-based practice change proposal. Include two specific sources on information in your discussion‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍.

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease add a couple of additional references I need to expan

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease add a couple of additional references I need to expand the cultural assessment paper written to include all of the items in the rubric‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ that is included and PowerPoint slides and a one-page abstract for the other students to read. If more slides are needed, please let me kno‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍w

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease read the task sheet criteria CAREFULLY ( in the attac

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease read the task sheet criteria CAREFULLY ( in the attachment). Thank you. Aim for 70%-75% out of 30. English as my second language so please dont make it fancy, simple and easy to understand is required. Please use Australian english. APA 7 references list ( excluded in word count) In cite text APA 7 ( included in word count) Please follow task sheet requirement carefully word limit 1600 +/-10% Please use Australia resources for clinical practice – please use high quality resource – peer review -resource must be 7 years, unless it needs support from guideline DSM or unchangable theory. Australian english Assessment name: Case-based analysis with questions relating to clinical practice Task description: This assessment requires you to answer a series of questions related to clinical cases provided (below), integrating relevant and contemporary literature to support your responses. What you need to do: ???? Refer to the questions below and prepare responses. ???? Clearly identify each of your question responses. ???? Do not re-type the questions as this will inflate the similarity percentage match with Turnitin ???? All responses should integrate evidence as support using QUT APA in-text referencing with specific page number. A reference list needs to be provided at the end of your document. As a guide a minimum 10 current relevant and credible references should be used. ???? Follow the word limit provided for each question response. ???? Read the Criterion Reference Assessment for this task. This will help you to understand what is required of you and how this assignment will be graded. ???? You do not require an introduction or conclusion. ???? Please carefully edit your work to‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ keep within the word limit. Length: Total 1600 words, +/-10% (word length includes in-text referencing and excludes your reference list). Estimated time to complete task: 30 hours Weighting: 30% How will I be assessed: 7-point grading scale using a rubric Due date: Friday 22th October – submitted via Turnitin in your NSB204 Blackboard site by . ? Presentation requirements: This assessment task 3 requirements are: ???? Clearly label your responses with the question number. ???? Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit code and page number. ???? 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text ?NSB204 – Assessment Task 3 Page 2 of 8 ?Assessment 3 NSB204 Mental Health Self and Others ???? Use font, such as Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri; font size 12 ???? CiteWrite APA style referencing (see ???? Be submitted in word doc electronic format via Turnitin. ???? All three questions need to be addressed in one document. ? Learning outcomes assessed: 1. Apply principles of cultural safety and reflect on self to articulate the role of self in person-centred mental health care and therapeutic use of self. 2. Demonstrate and apply knowledge of the challenges and factors that can compromise mental health for ourselves and others in order to promote positive mental health and wellbeing. 3. Describe key mental health issues and work with consumers and carers to address needs and promote recovery across the care continuum applying the Recovery Model. What you need to submit: One (1) word document that contains your responses to assessment questions and reference list. 2 document attached 3 task sheet drug s‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍trategy