Friendship. Choose one issue that falls under the heading of friendship—for exam

Friendship. Choose one issue that falls under the heading of friendship—for example, utility friendship, or friendship between unequals, or friends living together, or the stability of friendship. Choose at least two texts that deal with this issue and reconstruct the arguments as cogently as possible. After a full reconstruction you may evaluate the arguments or extend them or take them in your own direction.
Write using this prompt with the texts Cicero and Aristotle Nicomachean ethics

NOTE: The lab report assignments have changed in an important way, as of May 201

NOTE: The lab report assignments have changed in an important way, as of May 2015. If you are getting help from friends who have taken the course before, please make sure you understand that as of May 2015 you must fulfill an additional requirement with regard to citing material from the current module in your report. Please see below for further detail.
Please note that although this assignment is similar to the previous report’s, it has important differences.
The particular purpose of this assignment is to get you to analyze a “mythic guy” myth from your own culture in the same way we analyze classical myths (and certain of their current counterparts) in this course. The assignment is called a lab report because I want to encourage you to see the places where stories get told (movie theaters, living rooms, sports arenas) as a kind of laboratory for our study of myth.
To this end, you are encouraged especially to explore the possibilities of movies, TV, popular music, and video-games. Nevertheless, as long as your example was originally produced after 1940, it will be acceptable. If you have an example you’re dying to do that’s earlier, e-mail me and we’ll discuss it. If you do not communicate with me, and use a myth from outside this date-range, you will lose ten points.
For this assignment, you need to find a “mythic guy” myth. In general, if you find a guy doing stuff that makes other people think he’s really great, you’ve got some kind of mythic guy myth.
In order to complete the assignment, execute the following steps:
1. Find an example of a current myth. As long as you find that example to express cultural truth-value, it will do fine. Note that the myth may be a single episode of a TV show, a single song, or a single quest, scenario, or level of a larger game, or it may be a longer sort of narrative.
2. Write a one-to-two paragraph summary of the myth, as if for someone (me) who hasn’t seen it, heard it, or played it. This summary does not count towards the word-count of number 3. This part of the assignment is essential. It is not to be copied from other sources, and copying any part of it from other sources, including your own previous papers, without attribution IS PLAGIARISM. Even should you cite the work of others, including yoursef, not writing an original summary for your lab report will cost you twenty points, because framing the story you will analyze properly for the analysis you intend to carry out is an essential skill that this course hopes to teach. Therefore, DO NOT RE-USE A SUMMARY FROM A PREVIOUS REPORT UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO LOSE TWENTY POINTS.
3. Write a 500-750 word analysis of the myth as an expression of cultural truth-values in comparison to classical myths covered in this course. There’s no right or wrong way to write this analysis, and it doesn’t have to sound like a regular paper, though analyses that sound like regular papers will have an easier time being successful. Above all, remember that the truth-values of myth are cultural, and not personal. That is, you must be analyzing your myth as an expression of things that your society holds to be true, rather than things that just you hold to be true. Obviously, in many cases, the truth-values of your society will be your own trurth-values as well, but the same is most definitely not true in reverse, because there are many things that we hold to be true as individuals that may not be the same as what others in our society believe. (For the sake of thoroughness, also note that there may be truth-values that your society holds which you don’t hold, and it’s perfectly acceptable to analyze your myth as an expression of those.)
4. Your classical comparison must include material from the course readings and lectures of the current module. At the end of your analysis, please list in very brief form (“proper” citation isn’t necessary) the material you have cited from the current module’s materials in 1) one or more of the primary readings other than Odyssey or Metamorphoses, and/or one or more of the Wikipedia articles, 2) Odyssey or Metamorphoses, and 3) the lectures (basic video lectures, supplements, or notes are all acceptable). Each of those categories carries three points, which you will not get without citing material from it, from the current module.
Turn the report in via HuskyCT, in the Module 6 Lab Report Assignment, by attaching a document. See the course schedule for due dates.
Your assignment will be scored out of 100, and will count for 5.71% of your final grade.
Scoring Rubric
Successful lab reports:
1) Show that you understand the course definition of myth as narrative expression of cultural truth-value (in this assignment, by demonstrating knowledge of the mythic guy syllabus).
2) Use your knowledge of the reading and lectures from the current module to make comparisons of modern and ancient myth (in this assignment, by demonstrating knowledge of the mythic guy syllabus) .
3) Analyze myths, both ancient and modern, as expressions of cultural truth-value (in this assignment, by demonstrating knowledge of the mythic guy syllabus).
4) Compare ancient myths to modern ones based on their truth-values (in this assignment, by demonstrating knowledge of the mythic guy syllabus).
5) Present detailed argument about specific moments in modern and ancient myths (here, limited to the modern comparison).
Each of those items counts for 20 points out of a total of 100 for each report. A Model Module 6 Lab Report is available for your review.
Note about SafeAssign submission
It is your responsibility to make sure your submission has gone through properly. If you have any doubt at all, please mail your team-leader. In cases where SafeAssign seems not to be functioning, attaching your work to a mail to your team-leader will serve as proof of timely submission, but note that in such cases you must submit the work in SafeAssign within 24 hours of the due-date, or provide documentation from the Digital Learning Center that they were unable to resolve your difficulty, to retain that timely status.

Explicitly the Trojan War was fought over the right to possess Helen. As the war

Explicitly the Trojan War was fought over the right to possess Helen. As the war progresses, we begin to see as readers that it becomes more than that. What are the two sides really fighting for (the conflict)? In your response provide examples of at least THREE different characters from the book and describe their motivations throughout the war and how these motivations drive their actions. Use at least 2 direct quotes in your response.
this is what you have to do and it has to be at least two pages it is for geek mythology on the trojan war