This week, you will write a literature review using three sources. For this lite

This week, you will write a literature review using three
sources.
For this literature review assignment, we are going to give
you a choice of three topics to choose from.
COPD: treatment mechanisms and prognosis
Asthma: corticosteroids use in children and side effects
DKA: Pros and cons of treatment protocols
You will need to determine the focus of inquiry and
determine which approach to analysis you should take based on the topic you
choose.
For this review, be sure to:
Select three relevant and appropriate scholarly articles
that address the topic you chose.
Present a thorough literature review of the three articles
by summarizing, synthesizing, and evaluating the materials.
Incorporate citations into your body paragraphs; incorporate
the essential and most relevant supporting evidence eloquently and
appropriately.
Present your writing in a clear, organized manner.
Demonstrate understanding of the content presented in the
articles.
Use proper APA format with proper citations. Review APA
Citations Here(Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
LINK FOR THE FORMAT BELOW
https://owl.purdue.edu/
Your literature review should be 3–4 pages in length.
Remember, you will need to use APA formatting in your literature review and
include a title page and a reference page.
Review the rubric for more details on how your assignment
will be graded.
Rubric
General Education Standardized Rubric: Literature Review (1)
General Education Standardized Rubric: Literature Review (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Information is gathered from more than the required number
of research-based sources. Sources are scholarly and relevant to the topic.
17.8 to >14.4 pts
Meets Expectations
Information is gathered from the required number of
research-based sources.
14.4 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
A source may be missing or one or more sources are not considered
scholarly. One source may not be relevant to the topic.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Sources are missing, not cited or referenced, or are not
appropriate for academic work.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting,
Organization, and Structure
30 to >26.7 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Writing is well- organized, and demonstrates logical
sequencing and structure.There is a clear, comprehensive, and well-worded
introduction and conclusion. The topic/problem statement/thesis is clearly
stated at the beginning. Body paragraphs integrate citations and supporting
material into the writing smoothly and purposefully.
26.7 to >21.6 pts
Meets Expectations
Writing is generally well- organized, with some minor lapses
in sequencing and structure.There is an introduction and conclusion, but they
may be lacking in clarity. The topic/problem statement/thesis is stated at the
beginning but may be ambiguous or poorly presented. Body paragraphs integrate
citations and supporting material into the writing with some awkwardness.
21.6 to >17.7 pts
Approaches Expectations
Writing is poorly organized, with lapses in sequencing and
structure.May be missing an adequate introduction or conclusion. The
topic/problem statement/ thesis may not be stated but the reader can guess what
it is from context. Body paragraphs do not integrate citations enough to
support the material.
17.7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
There is no apparent organizational structure resembling
that required by the assignment. There is no introduction or conclusion. The
topic/problem statement/thesis is not stated or does not fit the assignment.
There are no citations or supporting evidence.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the
Literature
30 to >26.7 pts
Exceeds Expectations
A comprehensive analysis of the data (with in-text APA
citations as needed) is presented. A complete, detailed and accurate review of
the validity of the data/research methodology/findings/outcomes is presented.A
clear and thorough assessment of the relevance of the sources to the topic is
presented. The student’s unique contribution is clearly identified. Gaps in the
data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the
literature are clearly identified.
26.7 to >21.6 pts
Meets Expectations
A vague or incomplete analysis of the data (with in-text APA
citations as needed) is presented. A general review of the validity of the
data/research methodology/findings/outcomes is presented.A general assessment
of the relevance of the sources to the topic is presented The student’s unique
contribution is somewhat identified. Gaps in the data or analysis, or new
problems that emerge from your review of the literature are generally
identified but may be lacking detail.
21.6 to >17.7 pts
Approaches Expectations
The literature review does not include an analysis of the
materials but rather a summary. There is little or no analysis or synthesis of
information. Citations may be missing or they are incorrectly used. Reference
material may be unexplained or is not appropriate as evidence. The student
presents no unique contribution to the materials or topic.
17.7 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A review of the literature is missing or incomplete. The
review provides too little information to attach to a problem statement.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and
Mechanics
20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and
is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical,
spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced
correctly.
17.8 to >14.4 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with
only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling,
or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
14.4 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment occasionally uses current APA format and/or
has a many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Few sources are cited
and referenced correctly.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Mechanical
errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Sources are
not used and/or there is no reference page.
20 pts
Total Points: 100

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount