Part I (30 points) 1. Evaluate the report components of mock proficiency foren

Part I (30 points)
1. Evaluate the report components of mock proficiency forensic testing report and answer the following questions:
a. Is there a title to the report? (Yes or No) If so, what is it?
b. What is the name and address of the laboratory?
c. What is the name and contact information of the customer?
d. Who is the proficiency test provider? (Hint: its in the beginning of the Name(s) section of the report and it is an acronym)
e. Is there a description and unambiguous identification of the evidence items? (Yes or No) What are the evidence item numbers and descriptions?
f. Are results clear, unambiguous, and objective? (Yes or No) What are the results for the cutting of the questioned stain from the bedsheet? (Who did it match, who did it not match?)
g. What is the date of issuance of the report?
h. Who is the person(s) authorizing the report?
i. Is the report technically and administratively reviewed? (Yes or No) How do you know? (What information on the report tells you this?)
j. Where is the final location of the evidence?
Part II (9 points)
1. Evaluate the mock report review checklist and answer the following questions:
a. Is the identification of the person(s) technically reviewing the report noted?
Does it match the technical and administrative review initials on the report?
What is the date of the review?
b. Were the conclusion statements are checked for accuracy? How do you know?
c. Is the chain of custody evaluated? How do you know?
Part III (36 points)
1. Evaluate the mock quality assurance report of proficiency results and answer the following questions:
a. Is there a title to the report? (Yes or No) If so, what is it?
b. What is the Proficiency test identifier (Hint: it is in the Name(s) section of the report)
c. What were the results?
d. Who is the proficiency test provider? Give me the name.
e. Are they accredited? (Yes or No)
f. Is so to what ISO standard? [Hint: You have looked this up earlier in the semester, navigate to the same website and look the name of the proficiency provider]
g. What is the date the proficiency had to be submitted by?
h. Was feedback on individual performance provided to the analyst?
i. Were the reported inclusions correct?
j. Were the reported exclusions correct?
k. Were there any discrepancies noted?
l. Were there any notifications of a corrective action?