*you only need to do the reflection part and the presentation part I will get it

*you only need to do the reflection part and the presentation part I will get it done.
For your previous major assignment, you created a proposal for a solution to a problem in a local community.
For this assignment, you will reshape that argument into a digital multimodal argument. This argument will take the form of a 3-5 minute video pitch presentation arguing for your proposed solution to the problem you explored. For this argument, you will choose one of the stakeholders surrounding the issue you have investigated (Who is your target audience?) and craft an argument aimed toward that audience specifically (What do you want them to do?).
For example, if you argued in your proposal paper that the best way to encourage Oxford residents to recycle more is for the city to provide larger recycling bins, you could create a video presentation that explains to Oxford residents of the benefits of larger recycling bins and encourages them to contact city council representatives about getting larger bins.
Your video presentation will be between 3 to 5 minutes long and should make strong persuasive use of visuals. You could design a series of slides (in Canva or Google slides) and then record your own narration with free screen recording software such as screencast-o-matic, or you might compose an original video using iMovie (if you have a Mac), Adobe Creative Cloud, Loom, or Canva.
A digital multimodal text combines various modes of communication (words, visuals, gestures, sounds, etc.) using digital tools. Your assignment will not be assessed based upon your knowledge of digital tools. Rather, your digital multimodal argument and the accompanying reflection is expected to demonstrate:
intentional rhetorical decision-making (The choices you make about the visuals, sounds, words, etc. you include in your video should be intentional and meant to persuade);
attention to audience, purpose, argument, and genre expectation (Who is your target audience, what do you want them to do, and how do the choices you make for your video help you persuade them to do it?);
experimentation with composing strategies; (You should be willing to experiment with new ideas, modes, and programs, and be willing to scrap them and try something new if they don’t work to help you achieve your rhetorical purpose.)
and reflection about your composing process. (In your reflection, you will need to be able to explain your composing process, including your successes and failures, and defend the rhetorical value of the choices you make for your video.
Extended Writer’s Reflection
A major component of this project is your explanation and reflection of your work. In this 750 – 1250 word essay, you will reflect on the process of composing your remediation, including your rhetorical choices. You will also consider your past uses and understandings of multimodality, how your understanding of the term has changed, and how you might apply what you learned from this project to future contexts and situations.
Below are questions to help guide your reflection. You do not have to answer the questions in this specific order or answer every single one; however, the more thorough your reflection, the better.
How would you summarize your project?
What audience did you choose to remediate your project for? How did you meet the expectations of the audience you’re composing for?
What argument did you make? What was the solution you proposed?
What examples did you look at before drafting your work? Were any of these examples particularly influential? How did these examples inform your rhetorical and design choices?
What tools or technologies did you use to create your project? How did you learn the skills you needed to complete the work?
What was your process for creating this project? How did you plan?
Did you have to change or adapt your process along the way? Did you hit any roadblocks? What did you learn from having to adapt your process?
What did you take away from peer, writing center, and/or instructor feedback on your project? What was the most helpful feedback you received? What changes did you consider or make based on feedback?
What rhetorical choices did you make when creating your project? How did you aim your video at a particular audience and purpose? How did you implement rhetorical strategies such as kairos, ethos, exigence, pathos, and logos? (Remember, you do not need to address ALL of these rhetorical concepts—just the ones most important to your project).
How did the affordances of this new mode (video instead of academic paper) allow you to make the argument differently?
How did you cite and give credit to your sources?
What are your takeaways from this project? What did you learn? What skills did you build upon?
Is there anything you would do differently, given more time or resources?
Do you think your project could have any impact in your community? Why or why not?
How has your understanding of “multimodal” composing changed? Where do you think you might use multimodal composing in the future? Are there are takeaways from this project that might inform your future multimodal work?
Remember, this reflection is an essay, and it should be written in paragraph form. It should be submitted as an MS Word document in MLA format
(Links to an external site.)
with few to no grammar, spelling, or formatting issues.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount