write a two-pages critical response paper based on decolonizing global health be

write a two-pages critical response paper based on decolonizing global health beyond reformative roadmap and use the other one as resources to compare as well as reference reading for citation. However, mostly focus on the critical thinking part. Will be able to use maximum 2 outside sources for citation. The CRP represents an analysis, alongside some commentary, on another author’s writing. Your CR must contain a critical review of the reading selected; for this, you need to consider the following:
The first step is to summarize that which you are analyzing. Working through the reading, identify the main points and arguments contained in the work. Perhaps try to summarize these main points as you move through the text. Consider what evidence or support is given for each point. Reflect on how the work is structured and how this works towards achieving the text’s purpose.
Once you have gone over the text, reflect on whether its purpose was achieved and whether this purpose was meaningful. Evaluate the validity and effectiveness of supporting evidence. Also, consider the balance of the writing, in terms of whether more or less information was needed within each section.
Once you have reflected on the writing content, take some time to consider the style and structure of the text. Was the information organized in a way that helped or hindered your understanding? Did the structure suit the nature of the text? Finally, consider whether the language and style of the writing were in any way noteworthy, or specific to the text’s purpose.
Structuring your CR.
The introduction is used to establish your main argument regarding the work analyzed.
The summary of the reading is presented so that the reader will know what the text is about.
Find a way to connect this content-focused section with your analysis by starting with a commentary on the content. Here are some questions that might help you frame your response: What is the author’s main point? What evidence does the author use to support their claim, and do you think the evidence is compelling? Why or why not? Do you agree with the author’s argument? Why or why not? Does the argument challenge your views in any way? How do the concepts here build off of others, and can those concepts be extrapolated to other topics or ideas? Follow with a comment on the style and structure of the text that you are analyzing.
Remember that you should always apply critical thinking; this means that you should be able to back up any statement you made.
Your conclusion should bring all of the points you have made together in a manner that supports your writing’s main argument, as set out in the introduction.
FORMAT
Times New Roman 12
1.5 spaced
APA style for citations and references
Evaluation.
Introduction. 10
Body. 70
Conclusion. 10
References. 5
Orthography and typography. 5
(do not spend too much word on summarizing the text, the critical thinking part is the most important, it is pretty short so be elaborate)