Assignment question Select a setting you’re familiar with. Refer to Module 1 and

Assignment question
Select a setting you’re familiar with. Refer to Module 1 and Module 7 regarding the concept of a setting.
In your reflective piece:
• PART A: Describe one change that would further promote health and wellbeing within your chosen setting and explain why this change is important based on the best available scientific evidence (20 marks);
• PART B: Provide a plan of how this change could be enacted using the principles of health promotion introduced in Module 1 and examples provided in the other modules (15 marks).
• Writing and referencing (5 marks).
In your response, you are required to reference a minimum of two of the resources provided in this unit, which may include videos, articles, or podcasts. These resources can include the core resources as well as additional resources listed at the end of each module. It is anticipated you go beyond what is here to generate your evidence.
We want you to think critically and creatively.
Word limit
The word limit is 500 words of text (+/- 10%), excluding your reference list. Label PART A and PART B. We ask to keep your submissions to two pages – no title page; and please write your SID on the top header of your assignment.
Style guide
Please use Vancouver referencing styleLinks to an external site..
It is your responsibility to check and make sure you have submitted the correct assignment and that the assignment has successfully been uploaded.
Marking criteria
You will be marked on how well you have demonstrated achievement of these learning outcomes:
• Describe the principles of health promotion and their application to the broader context – healthy people, healthy communities, healthy environments;
• Apply critical thinking about health information and evidence as they relate to personal, community and environment health.
In applying the Grade Descriptors to your final assignment (in addition to the usual grading for grammar, cohesion of writing, appropriate use of reference material), careful consideration will be given to:
1. the complexity of the ‘setting’ as described,
2. the calibre of the evidence used (with primary sources of evidence weighted favourably),
3. the level of sophistication in proposed solution, and
4. the alignment of this solution to the 3 pillars of health promotion.