Researching, analyzing, and critically evaluating claims from four peer-reviewed

Researching, analyzing, and critically evaluating claims from four peer-reviewed studies to determine if they are replicable. This process will take place across the semester and culminate in a final paper, which is described in more depth below.
COURSE OBJECTIVES ASSESSED BY THIS ASSIGNMENT
●    Assess the appropriateness of conclusions derived from psychological research, including the interpretation and description of statistical results
●    Demonstrate effective written communication skills, including use of APA style and professional writing conventions appropriate to purpose and context
●    Locate and use relevant databases, research, and theory to plan, conduct, and interpret the results of research studies
●    Read and accurately summarize scientific literature in psychology
●    Use reasoning to recognize, develop, defend, and criticize scientific claims
PAPER REQUIREMENTS
Title Page:
– Correctly formatted in APA style with all of the required information.
Literature Review / Background:
– Follows the general structure of the Literature Review for a primary journal article:
– Begins broadly, by defining key terms and stating the research question, which in this case concerns the replicability of a previous published study.
– The introductory paragraph is followed by a review of relevant research that provides supporting evidence for the hypotheses of the study you are replicating.
– Ends by re-stating the research question and briefly previewing the method and the hypotheses for the project
– Includes 6 logically relevant peer-reviewed references correctly formatted in-text citations according to APA style 7th edition.
– Demonstrates evidence of synthesis.
– The paper should not be in a one paragraph per study format.
– There should be clear themes developed, with each theme demonstrating a clear connection to the research question and hypotheses of the paper.
– Each theme should be supported by multiple studies. The supporting evidence should build on the theme in increasing complexity or nuance.
– No more than 3 pages.
Method:
– The Method section should include all of the relevant sections (Participants, Materials, Design, and Procedure).
– Properly formatted headings and indentations.
– Each section must contain relevant and accurate information about the replication project. This information will be discussed throughout the course and in lab sessions.
Results:
– Reports the results of the replication study you selected. You are responsible for conducting the analysis yourself.
– Conducts the appropriate analysis
– Reports the correct results of the statistical tests as well as descriptive statistics (e.g., means and standard deviations)
– Presentation of the results is formatted correctly.
Discussion:
– Recaps the primary research questions and findings
– Considers how the findings fit into the larger research literature
– Address limitations and suggest future research
References:
– Page should be formatted according to APA style 7th edition
– Should include all of the references cited in-text (minimum of 6).
– Each reference entry should be correctly formatted with all of the relevant information (see APA manual as well as course resources to help you with this.)

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount